Listen — audio overview
Trust What You See: A Guide to Believing Your Own Memory
It starts small. You remember agreeing to meet his family on Saturday, but he insists you said Sunday. You are sure she mentioned wanting to live in a separate home after marriage, but now she looks at you, bewildered, and says, "I would never say that, you must have misunderstood."
At first, you brush it off. Memory is fallible. In the whirlwind of meetings, calls, and family discussions that define a matrimonial search, details can get blurred. Perhaps they were intensely charming and affectionate at the start, a phenomenon sometimes called 'love bombing', making it easy to believe the best of them. You want this to work. You trust the person you are building a life with. So you adjust your memory. You give them the benefit of the doubt.
But then it happens again. And again. An argument about finances is suddenly not about money, but about how you’re being “too sensitive.” A clear promise about your career is recast as a “casual thought” you’ve blown out of proportion. You find yourself apologising for things you are not sure you did, replaying conversations in your head, and a quiet, corrosive question begins to form: Am I going crazy?
You are not. You are likely experiencing gaslighting, a form of emotional manipulation where a person systematically undermines your perception of reality. Its purpose, intended or not, is to make you doubt yourself so profoundly that you defer to their version of events, their priorities, and their control. Naming it is the first step toward reclaiming your own mind.
The Architecture of a Rewritten Reality
Gaslighting isn't a single, dramatic lie. It is the slow, steady erosion of your confidence through a thousand tiny, repeated denials. It works because it exploits the very foundation of a relationship: trust. The compressed timeline and high stakes of an arranged marriage create a perfect environment for this behaviour. With the pressure to commit high, people are incentivized to hide their true selves until the wedding is secured, making grand promises they have no intention of keeping.
Let's look at how it operates in practice.
The Erased Agreement
Aditya, a 32-year-old software architect from Hyderabad, and his fiancée Kavya were discussing their future. The conversation took place at his parents’ home, with both families present. Kavya was clear: her elderly mother, who lived alone, would need to move in with them after a year or two. In front of everyone, Aditya, wanting to be supportive, agreed. He remembers his own father nodding in approval.
Two months later, with the wedding date approaching, Aditya brings it up in a private phone call. "I was looking at some three-bedroom flats in Gachibowli," he says. "We'll need the space for when your mother joins us."
Kavya is silent for a moment. "My mother? Why would she join us? I never said that."
Aditya is thrown. "You did," he insists. "We spoke about it at my parents' house, with everyone there. You said it was very important to you."
"I think I would remember saying something like that," she says, her tone cool and slightly pitying. "My mother is perfectly happy where she is. Honestly, you seem a bit stressed lately, maybe you're imagining things. You're mixing up a public discussion with a private promise."
What is happening here is a devastatingly effective piece of emotional warfare. Kavya’s move is a direct, confident denial of a previously agreed-upon point, a promise made in front of both families. The effect of this is to instantly shift the conversation’s focus. It is no longer about housing or family obligations; it is now about Aditya’s memory, his stress levels, and his reliability as a narrator of his own life. As Aditya is forced to defend his sanity, Kavya is also running a probe, learning something critical. By responding with such finality, she is testing whether he will back down and accept her version of reality. If he does, she learns that even foundational agreements, witnessed by their parents, can be unilaterally rewritten later in private.
- The Incentive: Why would someone do this? The innocent explanation is a genuine, complete failure of memory, or a deep anxiety about the topic that leads to denial. The strategic explanation is that she has changed her mind, or was never sincere in the first place, and erasing the original promise is easier than renegotiating it honestly. It shifts the cost of the change entirely onto Aditya.
- The Calibration: A single instance of forgetting is human. A pattern is not. The innocent version looks different: "Really? I honestly don't remember that conversation at all. Can you remind me when it was? I'm so sorry, my mind must have been elsewhere. Let's talk about it again now." This response is collaborative. It seeks to restore a shared reality, not impose a new one. The manipulative version shuts down inquiry.
This dynamic is not about gender; it is about control. Reverse the roles in this scene, and the mechanism remains identical.
The Character Assassination Defence
Sometimes, the gaslighting isn't about denying an event, but rewriting your motive for bringing it up.
Rina, a 28-year-old marketing manager in Mumbai, noticed a pattern. Her fiancé, Sameer, would frequently commit to family events on her behalf without checking with her first. When she tried to discuss it, the conversation always took a sharp turn.
"Sameer," she started one evening, "your uncle's housewarming is on Saturday. You told your mother we'd be there, but I have that important work deadline. We need to talk before you commit us to things."
Sameer’s face hardened. "I can't believe you're saying this. My family is already worried you don't like them. Are you ever going to make an effort? You're so unsupportive. You just don't care about my family."
The original, reasonable issue—the need for basic communication in a partnership—has vanished. The conversation is now about Rina’s supposed lack of support, her coldness towards his family, and her flawed character. She is now forced to defend her intentions instead of solving the logistical problem. This is an incredibly effective way to ensure the original behaviour never has to be addressed or changed. An ordinary boundary-setting conversation is reframed as an attack, making you hesitant to ever raise a legitimate issue again.
Patterns to Recognise
Gaslighting is a pattern, not a single event. It relies on repetition to work. Instead of generic labels, listen for the music of these recurring moves in the specific context of a matrimonial alliance:
"I never said your mother could hold onto your stridhan for safekeeping. That never happened." This is the flat denial, stated with absolute conviction to make you question a conversation you know you had.
"Yes, I said I was open to you working, but I never said I was open to you working in a different city. You're twisting my words." This is the minor edit, changing one key detail to shift the blame entirely onto you.
"It was just a joke when I said my friends' bachelor party would cost ₹2 lakhs. Why are you always so dramatic about money?" This reframes your valid financial concern as an emotional failing, an appeal to your supposed sensitivity.
"You sound crazy right now. We never agreed you'd go for your PhD after marriage; everyone knows that's not practical." This is a direct assault on your sanity, invoking an imaginary consensus—"everyone knows"—to isolate you.
"I don't know what you're talking about when you say 'a joint account for household expenses'." This is strategic withholding, feigning ignorance to force you to repeat yourself until you feel exhausted and foolish.
One of the most powerful signs is not something they do, but something that is consistently absent: a curiosity about your perspective. A healthy partner, when faced with a disagreement, asks questions: "Help me understand why you saw it that way," or "What did I say that made you feel like that?" A gaslighter has no interest in your reality; their only goal is to enforce their own.
How to Build Your Anchor in Reality
If you feel you are losing your footing, your first job is not to win the argument. It is to find solid ground for yourself. The power of gaslighting comes from its ability to isolate you inside your own head. The antidote is to externalise.
1. Write It Down.
This is not about gathering evidence to use against them. This is for you. After a confusing conversation, take five minutes to write down what happened, what was said, and the date. Use a private journal or a password-protected note on your phone.
- From: "He said he would call my father to discuss the wedding budget last week."
- To: "June 12: Spoke with Rahul on the phone at 8 PM. I asked if he had spoken to my father about the budget. He said he hadn't, but promised to do it by this Friday, June 15. He said, 'I give you my word, it will be done.'"
This simple act creates an external record of your reality. When the story changes next week—"I never gave you my word, I said I would try”—you have an anchor. You can look at your own notes and confirm your memory.
2. Confide in One Trusted Person.
Choose one friend or family member—someone grounded, objective, and loyal to you above all else—and share a specific incident. Frame it as a reality check, not gossip.
You might ask them an exact question like this: "I had a conversation with my fiancé yesterday and now I'm feeling very confused. I remember X happening, but he insists Y happened. Can I tell you what I remember and you can tell me if it sounds logical?"
A truly helpful friend won't just offer weak validation. They will help you reconstruct the event by asking clarifying, forensic questions: "What were his exact words when he said that?" "When he claimed you were being unsupportive, what did you say next?" "Walk me through the conversation from the beginning." This process helps you rebuild your own narrative on solid ground. Be wary of confiding in a relative who might prioritise the 'honour' of the match over your well-being, or who may have already been turned into an unwitting accomplice. A manipulator can easily present a 'concerned' front to your own family ("I'm so worried about her, she seems so forgetful lately"), isolating you from your support system before you even realise it.
What to Actually Do This Week
If this article resonates, your priority is not confrontation, but clarity. A person deeply invested in this pattern is unlikely to change just because you call them out. In fact, confronting them can often lead to more intense gaslighting ("Now you're reading articles on the internet and accusing me? See how paranoid you've become?"). For your own safety and well-being, treat this as an observation phase.
- Start a Private Log: For the next seven days, document any conversation that leaves you feeling confused, doubtful, or "crazy." Note the date, the topic, and the exact phrases used. Do not announce you are doing this. This is for your eyes only.
- Run a Small Boundary Test: Choose one low-stakes issue. Set a clear, reasonable boundary. For example: "I cannot take calls after 10 PM on work nights." Now, observe the response.
- A healthy response: "Okay, understood. Thanks for letting me know."
- A gaslighting response: "Why are you being so difficult all of a sudden? You never used to have a problem with it. You must be angry with me about something else." The response isn't about the boundary; it's about your motive for setting it.
- Trust the Changes in Yourself: Are you recording calls or saving screenshots "just in case"? Do you rehearse simple conversations before having them? Do you find yourself apologising more and more? Your own behaviour is a powerful signal that something is wrong. You are trying to manage an unmanageable situation.
If, after observing and documenting, you confirm a consistent pattern, you need to take it seriously. This is not a communication problem to be solved with more talking. It is a fundamental issue of respect and character. Seek support from a trusted family member, a close friend, or a professional counsellor. If you decide to end the relationship, especially if you have any safety concerns, make your plan quietly. Your departure does not need to be a debate.
Choosing a life partner is the most important decision you will make. You are not just choosing a person; you are choosing your future narrator. Find someone who respects your memory as a sacred text they get to share, not a draft they have the right to edit. You deserve a partner who helps you build a shared reality, not one who systematically dismantles your own.
